Verification and methodology

Evidence & Research Centre

CDMM’s ambition is presented alongside clear claim status, source scope, analytical methods and the boundaries between precedent, proposal and scenario.

Accessible media

Watch / Listen

Use the narrated film, audio-only playback, English captions or complete transcript.

Watch with captionsEvidence & Research · 00:44
Listen to the narrationAudio-only playback · no autoplay
Download captions Download transcript
Independent Research & Stress TestingAudit library, source verification, research concepts and enterprise safeguards.

Research verification

Finding-level evidence status

Verified

Supported by suitable primary, government, peer-reviewed, academic, or similarly authoritative evidence.

Partially Verified

Evidence supports part of the finding but not necessarily the complete claim.

Research Required

Interesting finding requiring stronger evidence.

Contradictory Evidence

Credible evidence produces materially different conclusions.

Scenario / Hypothesis

Analytical proposition rather than established empirical evidence.

Evidence classification

Every important claim carries the right kind of support

01

Established Evidence

Observed, cited evidence with a defined scope.

02

Existing Program or Policy

A documented program or policy in its actual jurisdiction.

03

Existing Legal Authority

Authority confirmed in applicable legislation, regulation or legal analysis.

04

Comparable Precedent

A similar mechanism operating elsewhere, without implying equivalence to CDMM.

05

CDMM Proposal

A stated part of the proposed CDMM architecture.

06

Scenario-Modelled Outcome

A conditional result driven by disclosed assumptions.

07

Required Legislative Change

An element not available under current authority.

08

Area for Further Research

A question of evidence or design that remains open for analysis.

Primary-source register

Selected authoritative foundations

Each source is used for the specific proposition stated here. A precedent for one mechanism does not establish the complete CDMM architecture or its outcomes.

F1

Constitution Act, 1867

Justice Laws Website

Municipal institutions, hospitals, licences, local works, natural resources, electricity and constitutional context.

Source
H1

Housing Accelerator Fund agreements

Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation

Municipal action plans and reporting; not evidence of CDMM housing cost or outcomes.

Source
H2

Core housing need in Canada

Statistics Canada

Indicator definition and national context; local baselines remain necessary.

Source
G1

Retail Grocery Market Study

Competition Bureau Canada

Competition findings; not evidence that municipal ownership lowers prices.

Source
G4

Household Food Security Survey Module

Health Canada

Validated household food-security measurement approach.

Source
HC1

Canada's health care system

Health Canada

Federal, provincial and territorial roles in public healthcare.

Source
W1

CCDA Activity Review

Red Seal Program

Provincial and territorial apprenticeship roles and interprovincial collaboration.

Source
R1

Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality

Health Canada

Science-based values with jurisdiction-specific implementation.

Source
E1

Saint John Energy

Saint John Energy

A city-owned electricity utility in its own legal and operating context.

Source
D1

Telecom Regulatory Policy 2016-496

Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission

Universal service objective; not proof of local service performance.

Source